The Table Below Shows the Number of Visitors to Ashdown Museum

Lilie King
Written by Lilie

Scored a 7 twice in the writing test

May 16, 2021

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

This essay question is from Cambridge IELTS 11 Test 4 Writing Task 1.

the table below shows the numbers of visitors to ashdown museum

Sample Essay

The table displays how many people visited Ashdown Museum in the year prior to and the year following its refurbishment, while the pie charts illustrate the responses to surveys of visitor satisfaction during the same two years.

Overall, visitor numbers and satisfaction both increased following the refurbishment.

ielts essay bank vip membership logo

Learn How To Write a 7+ Report By

  • Selecting Data Smartly
  • Reporting Features Accurately

There were 74,000 people visiting the museum in the year before it was refurbished, and this number climbed significantly to 92,000 in the year after the refurbishment.

Moving on to visitor satisfaction, those who rated their experience as ‘dissatisfied’ made up the greatest proportion of respondents in the year before the museum was refurbished, at 40%. However, this number showed a dramatic decline to only 15% after the refurbishment. The proportion of respondents who were very dissatisfied with their visit also fell, to only 5%. The proportions of those who responded ‘satisfied’ and ‘very satisfied’, in comparison, both went up in the year after the refurbishment, to 40% and 35% respectively, and these were the two most common responses that year.

170 Words

How to Vary Your Language

Were very satisfied with

Example     At 35%, those who were very satisfied with their visit made up the second greatest proportion of respondents in the year after the refurbishment.

Note that in ordinary English, “satisfied” includes “very satisfied”, and if you want to refer only to people who answered “satisfied” and not also include the ones who answered “very satisfied”, then you can use the two constructions below.

Rated their experience as “satisfied”

Example     At 40%, those who rated their experience as “satisfied” made up the greatest proportion of respondents in the year after the refurbishment.

Responded “satisfied”

Example     At 40%, those who responded “satisfied” made up the greatest proportion of respondents in the year after the refurbishment.

34 CommentsLeave A Comment

  1. The two surveys shows the numbers of visitors and satisfaction of the visitors in the table chart and pie charts , before and after refurbishment of the Ashdown Museum  respectively.

    Overall the numbers of visitor’s from 18,000 and the 75% total satisfaction towards the ashdown Museum has been increased after the refurbishment.

    As per the results of the survey, year before the refurbishment, most of visitors shows theirs dissatisfaction which is 40% and 10% of shows very dissatisfaction to the museum. Out of 74,000 visitors votes were only 10% satisfied, 15% very satisfied and 5% did bot responded to the survey. 

    Furthermore, with the 92,000 of visits feedback from this Survey, there is more improvement shows after the refurbishment and as a result 35% were very satisfied and 40% satisfied. There are some visitors still shows their dissatisfaction by 15% and 5% very dissatisfaction with the museum. 5% of visitors remained silent without voting. Even though there are 20% of visitors not happy and satisfied with the Ashdown museum after the refurbishment. That can be take as a feedback to develop and increase the visitors satisfaction

  2. The picture below depicts the overall calculations of travellers to Ashdown Museum and result of investigation, questioning how content they were pre and post re -construction of the museum.

    Overall, the total number of tourists has been drastically increased after renovation. Whereas, greater percentage of population were verysatisfied after renovation in contrast to before .

    To begin with , 74,000 population were visited pre refurbishment and individuals drastically surged to 92,000 post renovation.
    Regarding participants taken part in the survey, results shows 30% were satisfied ,40%dissatisfied ,15% very satisfied and only 5% didnot responded before reconstruction. In contrast, very satisfied individuals ascends to 35% , dissatisfied decreased to 15% ,satisfied to 40% and no response population remains the same .

  3. The table illustrates how many people visited Ashdown Museum in the year prior and the year following its refurbished and the responses of visitor satisfaction during the same two years.
    Overall, it can be seen that the maximum number of visitor and the proportion of satisfaction were after the year of its refurbishment.

  4. The following table illustrates how many people visited Ashdown Museum in the prior and later year of refurbishment. Also pie charts depict popularity survey depending on visitors satisfaction.

    Overall, Number of visitors increased after renovation of museum, as well satisfied vote had taken place of dissatisfied popularity.

    During the year before refurbishment, about 72 thousands visitors came to Ashdown Museum and the redevelopment had risen the number by 18 thousands.

    During the same two period, surveyors of museum, asked visitors about their satisfaction and categorized their choices in five different tags. A large number said they were dissatisfied (about 40 percent) with museums’ facilities, while the satisfaction rate was 30 percent. In the following year, a vice-versa trend had seen as satisfiers became equal to former dissatisfiers and dissatisfiers dropped to below halved by then.

    Also, very satisfaction vote increased to 35 percent from 15 percent, on contrary the reverse was true for very dissatisfied popularity. However, no response number remained the same.

  5. Hi Lilie, I have a question. Is it wrong to refer the word “respondents” to “visitors”?
    For instance, “Among the visitors, almost half of them (40%) responded ‘dissatisfied.’ “

    1. Yes, you can use ‘visitors’ but I wouldn’t use ‘almost half’ unless the percentage is greater than 45%. Also, ‘among’ is incorrect. Why not simply say that 40% of visitors responded ‘dissatisfied’?

  6. The total numbers of people visiting Ashdown Museum and their satisfaction level the year before and the year after refurbishment are presented in the table and the charts below, respectively.
    The number of visitors during the year following renovation outnumbered the individuals paying a visit to the museum a year prior to refurbishment. It is noticeable that the percentage of people who were categorized as “very satisfied” with their visit rose throughout the whole period, while the level of dissatisfied people enormously decreased in the same time.
    The total number of visitors throughout the year before stood at 74,000, and the figure for the year after refurbishment totaled 92,000. Results obtained by surveys display that the percentage of those visitors who declared to be “very satisfied” witnessed a huge increase from 15% before to 35% after structural renewal. The visitors who had a satisfied stance increased by 10%, reaching from 30% to 40% in the time interval.
    On the contrary, dissatisfied people comprised 40% of the total visitors in the year before and reduced by 25% (at 15%) the year after refurbishment. In the extreme, visitors who were “very dissatisfied” with their visit to the museum decreased by half (from 10% to 5%) during the whole period

  7. Hi,lilie. is it right to replace the word “refurbishment” by “sth be reconstructed”? Thank you~

  8. I’m preparing for IELTS exam and for writing tasks just following to U ” The great MAM 🌺” Cuz no one can teach and write like u. I pray, you may be blessed with more knowledge so learners can get advantage.

  9. Hi Lilie, May I know why did you use no synonyms for refurbishment such as renovation, improvement works or such?

    1. Hi Mannv, the words we can use depend on what the refurbishment involves. But we don’t have this information, right? There are few complete synonyms in English.

  10. Can somebody check my essay asap please?

    The table chart provide information about the number of comers to Ashdown Museum over 12 months period before and after reconstruction.
    The pie charts compare the results of feedbacks from visitors participated in survey.

    Overall, it is clear that there was a significant increase of comers to Ashdown Museum after redecoration and the majority of visitors were contended.

    Looking at the information in more detail, the total number of visitants per year before remodelling made up 74.000; however after refurbishment there was a considerable rose in the number of sightseers with figure growing to 92.000 during the year.

    Regarding of participants taken placed in the survey, results showed following information that until the reconstruction was applied the biggest proportion of people were displeased, at 40 % compared to 30% of those who were satisfied. The figures for very happy visitors along with very dissatisfied were almost the same, at 15% and 10% respectively, while the rest share of visitors who did not leave any response accounted for 5 percent. Over the following year after rehabilitation, the third-quater of visitors were super satisfied, at 75%, meanwhile , the number of discontented visitants has decreased dramatically to 20% and the percent of people who ignored stood at 5%.

  11. Please review it and give me score. Thanks.
    The table and pie charts display the number of visitors and their level of satisfaction with their visit, respectively, before and after the year of refurbishment. According to the data in the table, there was an increase of 16,000 visitors, from 74,000 to 92,000, after the refurbishment year. Along with this significant expansion in the number of visitors, the pie chart shows a significant growth in the number of highly satisfied visitors, from 15% before the refurbishment to 35% after refurbishment. However, there was a slight increase in the number of very dissatisfied visitors, from 30% before refurbishment to 40% after refurbishment. Similarly, the number of satisfied visitors declined from a ratio of 10% to half of that. During the entire tracked record, the ratio of people who did not respond to the survey remained constant at 5% of overall visitors.

  12. Please review my eassy

    The Table gives information about number of tourist to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was renovated. While , The chart illustrates about the result of survey asking guest how much they were satisfied with there tour, during the same two periods.

    Overall , In table the total numbers of visitors have increased after the renovation was done at the Ashdown Museum. Meanwhile , In the chart most of guest were very satisfied followed up with some were just satisfied. The tourist who were dissatisfied and very dissatisfied there dissatisfaction decreased after the refurbishment.

    First looking at the table , The ashdown museum had around 74,000 visitor in an year after the renovation take place the number of visitor had rise marginally to 92000 visitor in an year. The visitors increased by 22,000.

    Next by looking at the chart , Year before renovation only 15 percent people were very satisfied after changes it grew dramatically to 35%.The satisfied a year before were 30 percent which rise slightly to 40 % after development. The visitor dissatisfied reduced by two times after renovation to 5 percent. However , The very dissatisfied drop from 40 percent to 15 % that is reduced by 25 percent after changes were done in the museum. Only 5% of visitor response were same in both years after and before refurbishment.

  13. The table and the Pie Charts display the numbers of tourist to Ashdown Museum and the result of surveys on how much the visitors were satisfied during the year before and the year after it was renovated.

    Overall the total number of visitors significantly increased in the next year when the Museum was refurbished. Most of the tourists in the year before renovation were dissatisfied. However, after refurbishment of Museum majority of Travellers where either satisfied or very satisfied.

    Previously, around 74,000 Travellers visited Ashdown museum which rose to 92,000 just in the following year after its renovation. 40% of tourist were dissatisfied and 10% were very diasatisfied with the Museum a year before and 30% and 15% of respondents were satisfied and very satisfied each.

    In contrast, just a year after the renovation of museum the respondents were seem delighted as satisfied and very satisfied costumers rose significantly to 40% and 30% each. Yet, 15% were dissatisfied and 5% were very dissatisfied. However, 5% of the visitors did not bother responding in both years.

  14. The table and chart present the information about the total number of visitors Museum who visited Ashdown and the result of the surveys of visitors’ satisfaction respectively.
    The survey chart and the visitors’ number table are taken in two different time intervals (one year before refurbishment and one year after refurbishment). Moreover, the survey is further divided into five categories namely, very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, very satisfied and no response.
    The number of visitors increased from 74,000 to 92,000 after refurbishment in the Ashdown Museum. Moreover, the satisfied and very satisfied values also increased drastically from 15 to 35 and 30 to 35 respectively. Additionally, other categories such as dissatisfied customers decreased from 40 to 15 and very dissatisfied customers shows a dramatic decline in numbers from 15 to 10. The decline in a number of dissatisfied customers is due to increased satisfaction after refurbishment. However, the number of no responses remains the same in both surveys.

    1. The percentages of not-given responses remained the same in both surveys. Because the pie charts are showing the portions/percentages in total votes; the numbers are actually different because the number of visitors has been increased given by the table.

  15. The table demonstrates the amount of people, which visited Ashdown Museum during the year before and after reconstruction. The pie charts compared opinions of visitors, before period, when Museum was rebuilt and after that.
    As two pie charts demonstrate before refurbishment majority individuals was not satisfied their visit. However after reconstruction same quantity of respondents replied, that they had experienced gratification. The table depicts that quantity of visitors significantly increased after rebuilding of museum.
    Overall it is clear from the chart that almost half (40%) of reviewers were not pleasant of visiting before reconstruction. However, the amount of dissatisfactory individuals dramatically declined to 15% after rebuilding. As pie chart demonstrates that before refurbishment, less quantity (30 %) of visitors of museum was glad of attendance than dissatisfied. It is noticeable that the rates of satisfactory people slightly rose to 40% after rebuilding of museum. As table compares that during the year before reconstruction, Ashdown museum are visited by 74000 people. After rebuilding the amount of guests considerably increased to 92000.

  16. The given pie charts depicts the sum of tourists to Ashdown museum and the result of surveys of visitor satisfaction during the year before and after the refurbishment on the same two periods.
    Overall,it is clearly evedent that visitors numbes and satisfaction both increased following the refurrbishment.
    To begin with,there were significant rose in total number of visitors from 74000 to 94000 afthe the renovation.A rapid increased of 18000 individuals was the survey of old museum that 40%visitors out of 74000 were contrast,year after furnished the amount of disatisfied people almost swiftly decreased and recorded at 15% out of 92000.likewise,very satisfied were almost more than double i the favour of renovated museum and satisfied reviews also gained more popularity in new museum(40%)as compared to older mmuseum(30).similarly,no response(5%)people were same in both time period alhough,disatisfied reviews were 40% in befor the refurbishment which had rapidly decrease to 5% in new manufactured museum.

  17. The provide table represents the number of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year before refurbishment and the year after the refurbishment and the pie chart illustrates the results of the surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the both time periods.
    Overall,the visitors satisfaction is almost doubled in the year after refurbishment than the year before refurbishment. And total number of visitors also raised upto 92000 from 74000 after the renovation of the museum.

    According to the pie chart, the people who are dissatisfied with the visit was decreased exactly a quarter in the year after refurbishment. While coming to the people who are very dissatisfied decreased a minor portion of 5% in the year after the renovation of the museum.

    The people who are satisfied with their visit after the renovation are increased exactly 10 % and people who are very satisfied with visit more than doubled and reached to 35% in the year after the restoration of museum.And the people not responded remains unchanged.

  18. the given table illustrate the information about number of visitor to ashdown museum who visited two different time period before the renovated and after and pie charts depict satisfaction reviews by visitors about both old and new museum. it is noticeable that couting of the visitors were significant gain after the refurbishment. overall, it can be seen tagt in the survey of refurbished museum people had extreme satisfied than old museum. there had only 74000 tourist visited during the before refurbishment however, after the refurbishment visitor number had increased till 92000. survey of old museum that, 40% people were dissatisfied from museum. in contrast, year after refurbishment the amount of dissatisfied people almost swiftly decrease and recorded at 15% . very satisfied visitors were almost more than double(35%) in the favour of renovated museum and satisfied reviews also gained more popularity in new museum (40%) as compare to older museum but no response people were same in both time period although, dissatisfied reviews were 40% in before the refurbishment which had rapidly decreased in new museum

  19. The table displays how many people visited Ashdown musenen in the year prior to and year following refurbishment.The pie chart illustrate the details regarding satisfaction level of individuals who have come on the same year.

    Oveeall, it is evident that there was a significant increase in the number of toursit after its renovation. In addition, the review of the sightseers were outstanding after the refurbishment.

    Looking at the table in detail, 74,000 people visites the museum prior to restoration, and it elevated to 92,000 after restructuring. A rapid rise of 18,000 individuals was evident. With regards to the satisfaction level before rebuilding 15% were very satisfied, and it doubled when it come satisfied one. 40% completely got dissatisfied and around 5% of people have not given their response. But the following year after renovation, 40% of individuals remained satisfied, and 35% were very satisfied.Eventually the dissatisfied reduced to 15%. However, visitors who haven’t responded remained the same in both year.

    1. Sorry for the late reply. I’d give your essay a 6. I don’t think you need to mention “no response”. This category is not important at all. Also, try not to describe trends in such detail. Instead, you should make some comparisons. At least point out the biggest categories in both years.

      ✖️ “74,000 people visites the museum prior to restoration, and it elevated to 92,000 after restructuring.”
      “Restoration” and “restructuring” don’t mean the same as “refurbishment”.

  20. The given table illustrates the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum in the previous year and the followed by year it was refurbished. The pie chart denoted their satisfaction level as a percentage in 5 categories considered for the same two years. The number of visitors had been increased over the year while their satisfaction level too had been increased.

    According to the survey, the proportion of satisfied customers had significantly increased twice the level after it was renovated. Both satisfied and highly satisfied proportion was one fourth of the total before and it had increased up to three third after the renovation. However half of visitors were in the category of either dissatisfied or highly dissatisfied before the renovation happened and it has grammatically decreased to lower than one fourth of the total. However the percentage who had not responded to the survey remains the same in both two years which was 5% of the total visitors.
    Moving on to the visitors count, there were 74000 in the year before it was refurbished, and the count increased significantly to 92000 after and it was a clear increment of 18000 head count.

    { Dear Ms.Lilie King , please let me know my band score you can give for the above task 01)

    1. Hi, I’d give your essay a 5.5. It contains many grammatical errors. Also, you don’t need to describe the trends in such detail. Make some comparisons instead.

  21. The combination of table and pie chart reveals the information of count of people, who visited Ashdown Museum and survey pertaining to their satisfaction level prior and later to its renovation.

    Looking at the details, it is clear that a sharp incline was observed in visitors’ counting, after it was renovated, which rose by 18000 from 74000 of initial year. From this, 5 per cent individuals did not respond in the survey conducted and remained static for both time periods.

    Strolling forth, the proportion of people who stated their experience as ‘ satisfied ‘ was 15 and 35 respectively in both given years . With regards to those who rated themselves ‘ dissatisfied’ and ‘very dissatisfied’ , both showed a dramatic reduction, former reached to 15% from 40% over given years and latter plunged from 10% to its half after refurbishment. Although those who stated their satisfaction level as ‘ very satisfied ‘ were significantly above one- tenth initially, escalated to 35%in the later given year.

    Overall, it can be seen that along with an increment in number of folks visiting to Ashdown Museum, their satisfaction level also witnessed a surge. However, a drastic fall had been observed in dissatisfied visitors’ ratio.

    1. Sorry for the late reply, in your Details Paragraph 1, you used “from this”, but how did you know all the visitors took the survey? Besides, those who did not respond are not important at all. I don’t think you need to mention them.

      In your Details Paragraph 2, you only described the trends. There is no comparison. I think you should at least mention which group is the biggest after refurbishment.

      ✖️count of people
      ✖️visitors’ counting
      ✔️visitor count

      1. I think you can get a 6. You need to be careful with grammar. Most of your sentences either have grammatical errors or are unidiomatic.

        ..the proportionS of people who stated RATED their experience as ‘ satisfied ‘ was WERE 15 and 35 PERCENT respectively…

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *