The Most Important Aim of Science Should Be to Improve People’s Lives
Written by Lilie
7.5 in Academic Writing
Improved by Gregory
Born and Raised in Canada
August 17, 2023
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sample Essay
While enhancing human well-being through science is important, I believe that by no means should it be solely the primary goal of science. Equally important are safeguarding the environment and respecting animal rights.
In the practice of science, the improvement of human lives should never come at the cost of the environment. As the world’s population increases, creating better ways to produce food, such as more effective pesticides, becomes vital. Yet, if the focus remains solely on boosting crop yields, the pesticides developed may not only affect pests but also make the land infertile, worsening the preexisting issue of food scarcity. This highlights the importance of taking a balanced approach to scientific advancement that focuses on caring for both human lives and the health of the environment that they depend on.
Furthermore, testing drugs on animals raises serious ethical concerns. Ensuring the safety of novel medicines for human use is critical, but prioritizing human health over animal rights is morally unacceptable. Animals, much like humans, experience emotions and share the right to live freely and without unnecessary suffering. Subjecting them to prolonged captivity solely for testing can result in both physical and psychological suffering. As moral beings, we have a responsibility to treat animals compassionately and avoid such acts of brutality in the name of human betterment.
In conclusion, although improving people’s lives is an important aim of science, I believe that it should never overshadow other vital objectives within the field. We must also give equal priority to environmental preservation and animal welfare, striking a balance between scientific progress and ethics for a better world. (266 Words)
13 CommentsLeave A Comment
(Hi Lillie, Please look at my essay and give your opinion)
The most significant aim of science should be towards improving people’s lives better, however, I don’t agree with the statement given in the question, but I think it should rather focus on the research of the nature and the evolution of life.
Science should emphasis more on the natural research instead of improving people’s lives because it enables more discovery of new elements that can contribute to the scientific world. Moreover, research findings in the exploration of nature have potential benefit for humankind and other species, particularly Sir Isaac Newton’s experiment about apple falling from the tree which is a natural process leads to a discovery of gravitational force. Due to this, astronauts can travel space and move to different planets that is a major contribution for the science.
Another thing that science required to emphasis is the evolution of life. How life evolved from the Jurassic period to the modern day era is still a mystery, so that it’s very necessary to focus on it. Many scientists have researched about the life’s evolution, which resulted in various theory such as Darwin theory and Oparin Haldane theory with different perspectives. Moreover, human beings are curious and confused about how the life was formed and this cause people creating own beliefs and hypothesis which occurs unnecessary arguments .
In conclusion, I think science should focus on the natural research and evolution of life in order to discover new matters and to solve mystery .
Improvement in the lives of humans have seen a significant growth cause of advancement in science. but I disagree that the primary aim of science is limited to this. .I believe that science should also take in consideration of its impact in environment and should respecting animals rights.
In practice of science, the improvement should never come at a cost of environment. As the population increases the food resource consumption along increases and the requirement of developing better ways food creation such as pesticides becomes vital. if we solely focus on the increasing the yield, pesticides may not only harm pest but also make land infertile.This highlights the importance of taking a balanced approach by taking care of human need and environment safety we depends on.
furthermore, in order to make advancement in science, a larger number of experiments and testing has to be implemneted. for that most experiments we are using animals as test subject. such conduct are not only brutal practices but also inhuman. Animals right to live should not be taken away for science advancement, which is a very selfish thing to do.
in conclusion I would although improving human life is an important aim of science. We also have responsibility of taking acre of enironmnet and animal welfare throughout the process, striving to strike a balance between scientific progress and ethics is vital in order for a better world.
hello, I have ielts exam on June 11 and I want to participate in your 3-day writing course, I haven’t enough time. What should I do ?
Hi Lilie I would like to thank you. I got overall 7 and 6.5 in writing. Especially your writing tips and sample essays were extremely helpful. It is much appreciated. thanks a lot!
Hi Lilie, your first body paragraph begins with a focus on ‘scientific progress,’ which seems a bit off-topic from the essay prompt about science’s role in improving human lives. Could you clarify how this ties into the main aim of the essay? Thanks for considering my feedback!
Hi Hamed, I made some small adjustments. Please read it again and see if it still causes confusion.
hi lily, I was wondering regarding the type of question ” to what extent do you agree or disagree” in this sample of essay, I can see you dont use the opinion as previously you suggested that is ” I completely agree / disagree” can you clarify this?
Hi rani, you’re right. I’ve added “by no means” and “never” to the first and last paragraphs respectively. Please read again.
Does this sample achieve a 9 score?
I think it deserves at least an 8.
Thanks for your sharing. if I get a good score, I will tell you.
Thanks lilie for make this expensive contend free fo cost I really appreciate it and please make more you tube video for us
Technology has been escalating day by day since the last few seconds weather to give generous to human lives or protect themselves from detrimental eyes. It is widely acknowledged that, modern science will ruin our lives as well as hazardous threats for humans, but as far as I am concerned, I reckon that, it improves our life-standard and gives us long-lasting. To support my opinion, a narrate discussion is given below.
First of all, science plays a pivotal role in medicine. With the help of science and modern technology human beings are capable of generating new and beneficial antibiotics. consequently, folk who are infected by any adverse disease can eat this in order to secure some death, hence here it is proved that science helps a lot to live longer and bring prosperity in each individual life.
Furthermore, rather than giving advantages in the field of pharmacy, it has a lot of virtue in production of food. Since science already widely gives its 90% in the agriculture field, production of food rice and wheat should be boosted, so at the end, people do not die just because of food scarcity. Therefore, science should also more contributed in the area of agriculture.
On the contrary, it is commonly considered that, science might be improved in just a single perspective which is military purpose. They think that the primary focus of technology and science must be prioritised on developing war equipments rather than focus on human life’s and according to me it is totally wrong it has many knock-on impacts.
To conclude that, although contemporary science and technology are focused more on enhancing military power such as equipment and not much concerned about human life, science should be given precedence to individual life and this aim must be on primary goal.